
F or the physician evaluating patients who have had occupational exposure to asbestos, two issues having compensation and other legal ramifications, as well as health implications, are likely to arise. First involves the question regarding what action should be taken in the currently employed asbestosexposed worker with early but definite fibrogenic effects on the lungs and/or pleural surfaces, and secondly, under what circumstances does present knowledge allow us to make the determination that lung cancer in an asbestos-exposed individual can be attributed to that occupational exposure? In the discussion that follows, I shall attempt to provide a link between epidemiologic evidence obtained by our group and others, and the clinical determination responsive to these questions.
Male, Occupational Diseases, Lung Neoplasms, Asbestosis, Humans, Asbestos, Female
Male, Occupational Diseases, Lung Neoplasms, Asbestosis, Humans, Asbestos, Female
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 13 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
