
pmid: 8690390
Efforts to control health care costs increasingly rely on purchasers to seek the best value for their investment. In this examination of purchasing strategies in fifteen communities, most purchasers employed traditional strategies to reduce their direct costs, such as shifting costs to employees and switching from indemnity to managed care plans. Fewer purchasers--mostly large companies, public agencies, and coalitions--were using more resource-intensive strategies such as direct contracting with providers or selecting plans based on quality to improve value or efficiency. Although both sets of strategies might help to reduce costs, they are not yet changing the delivery of health care in local communities.
Group Purchasing, Cost Control, Health Care Coalitions, Community Health Planning, Competitive Bidding, Organizational Innovation, United States, Health Benefit Plans, Employee, Health Services Research, Cost Sharing
Group Purchasing, Cost Control, Health Care Coalitions, Community Health Planning, Competitive Bidding, Organizational Innovation, United States, Health Benefit Plans, Employee, Health Services Research, Cost Sharing
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 30 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
