
Robust normative data for pediatric learning and memory tests in Spanish-speaking populations are scarce, and existing approaches often rely on univariate methods that overlook item-level properties and inter-trial dependencies. The aim was to evaluate the item parameters of the TAMV-I using Item Response Theory (IRT) and to generate covariate-adjusted normative data through Linear Mixed Models (LMM). We hypothesized that the 2-parameter logistic (2PL) model would outperform the Rasch model and that demographic and contextual factors would show significant interactions influencing test performance. The sample consists of 1640 participants from Spain, Honduras, Ecuador, and Colombia. The inclusion criteria were being 6–17 years old, IQ ≥ 80 on TONI-2, and score<19 on the Children’s Depression Inventory (CDI). Children with a history of neurological and/or psychiatric disorders were excluded. Item parameters were determined using the 1,2-PL model. LMM were used to evaluate the effect of sociodemographic variables (sex, age, age², mean parent years of education-MPE, country, and interactions). Norms were generated based on participant ability. As a result, the item parameters were calculated and the LMM showed significant interactions for M P E * C o u n t r y , A g e * T r i a l , S e x * C o u n t r y and T r i a l * C o u n t r y . By integrating IRT with LMM, this study provides cross-national, covariate-adjusted norms for the TAMV-I, enhancing precision and clinical validity compared to previous approaches.
Male, Adolescent, Neuropsychological testing, Human learning, Colombia, Memory recall, Memory and Learning Tests, Learning and memory, Latin America, Honduras, Spain, Memory, Linear Models, Humans, Learning, Female, Ecuador, Child, Children, Research Article
Male, Adolescent, Neuropsychological testing, Human learning, Colombia, Memory recall, Memory and Learning Tests, Learning and memory, Latin America, Honduras, Spain, Memory, Linear Models, Humans, Learning, Female, Ecuador, Child, Children, Research Article
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
