
Data, including information generated from them by processing and analysis, are an asset with measurable value. The assets that biological research funding produces are the data generated, the information derived from these data, and, ultimately, the discoveries and knowledge these lead to. From the time when Henry Oldenburg published the first scientific journal in 1665 (Proceedings of the Royal Society) to the founding of the United States National Library of Medicine in 1879 to the present, there has been a sustained drive to improve how researchers can record and discover what is known. Researchers' experimental work builds upon years and (collectively) billions of dollars' worth of earlier work. Today, researchers are generating data at ever-faster rates because of advances in instrumentation and technology, coupled with decreases in production costs. Unfortunately, the ability of researchers to manage and disseminate their results has not kept pace, so their work cannot achieve its maximal impact. Strides have recently been made, but more awareness is needed of the essential role that biological data resources, including biocuration, play in maintaining and linking this ever-growing flood of data and information. The aim of this paper is to describe the nature of data as an asset, the role biocurators play in increasing its value, and consistent, practical means to measure effectiveness that can guide planning and justify costs in biological research information resources' development and management.
570, Biomedical and clinical sciences, QH301-705.5, Information Management, Veterinary and Food Sciences, 551, International Society for Biocuration, Medical and Health Sciences, Data Aggregation, veterinary and food sciences, Humans, Biology (General), Agricultural, Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, Information Dissemination, Data Science, Biological Sciences, Biological sciences, Knowledge, Perspective, 2.6 Resources and infrastructure (aetiology), Developmental Biology
570, Biomedical and clinical sciences, QH301-705.5, Information Management, Veterinary and Food Sciences, 551, International Society for Biocuration, Medical and Health Sciences, Data Aggregation, veterinary and food sciences, Humans, Biology (General), Agricultural, Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, Information Dissemination, Data Science, Biological Sciences, Biological sciences, Knowledge, Perspective, 2.6 Resources and infrastructure (aetiology), Developmental Biology
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 81 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
