
In this issue of PLoS Biology, Hebert et al. (2004) have set out to test the resolution and performance of “DNA barcoding,” using a single mtDNA gene, cytochrome c oxidase I (COI), for a sample of North American birds. Before turning to details of this study, it is useful as context to consider the following questions: What is DNA barcoding, and what does it promise? What is new about it? Why is it controversial? What are the potential pitfalls?
Electronic Data Processing, QH301-705.5, Computational Biology, Correspondence and Other Communications, DNA, Sequence Analysis, DNA, DNA, Mitochondrial, Birds, Evolution, Molecular, Species Specificity, Animals, Biology (General), Gene Library, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis
Electronic Data Processing, QH301-705.5, Computational Biology, Correspondence and Other Communications, DNA, Sequence Analysis, DNA, DNA, Mitochondrial, Birds, Evolution, Molecular, Species Specificity, Animals, Biology (General), Gene Library, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 802 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 0.1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 0.1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
