
doi: 10.1364/josaa.388703
pmid: 32400707
We recorded diffraction patterns using a commercially available slit and sensor over a wide range of experimental circumstances, including near- and far-field regimes and oblique incidence at large angles. We then compared the measured patterns with theoretical intensity curves calculated via the numerical integration of formulas derived within the framework of scalar diffraction theory. Experiment and theory show particularly good agreement when the first Rayleigh–Sommerfeld (R-S) formula is used. The Kirchhoff formula, though problematic in the context of mathematical consistency, agrees with the first R-S formula, even for large incidence angles, whereas the second R-S formula differs visibly. To obtain such a good agreement, we replaced the assumption of an incident plane wave with that of a Gaussian beam and implemented geometric corrections to account for slit imperfections. These results reveal how the scope of scalar diffraction theory can be extended with a small set of auxiliary assumptions.
Scalar diffraction theory, Single slit diffraction, Scalar diffraction theory ; Gaussian beam ; Oblique incidence ; Single slit diffraction ;, Oblique incidence, Gaussian beam
Scalar diffraction theory, Single slit diffraction, Scalar diffraction theory ; Gaussian beam ; Oblique incidence ; Single slit diffraction ;, Oblique incidence, Gaussian beam
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 7 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
