
“Soft power” challenged the coercion aspects of foreign policy, and professed attraction instead. In the last three years, the United States seems to have unconditionally accepted this as the centerpiece of its foreign policy. As a result, its inability to make tough choices implies fear of “Market-Leninists,” Islamist theocrats, and authoritarian despots. China, on the other hand, effectively uses soft power as a means to an end—and only when it works. What America must realize is that soft power is one of the tools of exerting foreign policy, and the Obama administration should be open to employing other tools depending on their effectiveness to resolve the situation at hand.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
