
pmid: 15881799
This paper explores some of the challenges raised by human genetic interventions for debates about distributive justice, focusing on the challenges that face prioritarian theories of justice and their relation to the argument advanced by Ronald Lindsay elsewhere in this issue of the Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal. Also examined are the implications of germ-line genetic enhancements for intergenerational justice, and an argument is given against Fritz Allhoff's conclusion, found in this issue as well, that such enhancements are morally permissible if and only if they augment primary goods.
Freedom, Health Priorities, Public Policy, Cultural Diversity, Vulnerable Populations, Resource Allocation, Social Control, Formal, Genetic Enhancement, Germ Cells, Socioeconomic Factors, Social Justice, Humans, Sex Preselection, Ethical Theory, Genetic Engineering, Ethical Analysis
Freedom, Health Priorities, Public Policy, Cultural Diversity, Vulnerable Populations, Resource Allocation, Social Control, Formal, Genetic Enhancement, Germ Cells, Socioeconomic Factors, Social Justice, Humans, Sex Preselection, Ethical Theory, Genetic Engineering, Ethical Analysis
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
