
How should the legal system respond when someone who has provided evidence in their capacity as an expert is perceived to have done so negligently? The question is considered in the context of both civil and criminal litigation in England and Wales. The Sally Clark litigation is used here as the main exemplar. Possible remedies are evaluated both as a means of penalising past negligence, and of preventing future negligence.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
