
doi: 10.1345/aph.1e083
pmid: 15522981
OBJECTIVE To review the literature investigating initial dosing of warfarin at 5 or 10 mg for treatment of acute venous thromboembolism. DATA SOURCES Articles were identified through searches of MEDLINE (1966–December 2003) using the key words warfarin, oral anticoagulation, warfarin dose, warfarin initiation, venous thromboembolism, and anticoagulation. Additional references were located through review of the bibliographies of the articles cited. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION Studies of the initial dosing of warfarin at 5 or 10 mg were evaluated and relevant information was included, as were those that identified known factors that influence the maintenance dose of warfarin. DATA SYNTHESIS For the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism, warfarin dosing is often provider dependent. Until recently, studies suggested that 5 mg initiation was as effective as 10 mg, without increasing the risk of bleeding. However, the most recent study comparing a 5- versus 10-mg initial dosing nomogram supports an initial dose of 10 mg. These results should be interpreted with caution, however, since patients at high risk for bleeding were excluded from the study. Several patient-specific factors will affect the maintenance dose, guiding clinicians to start with lower (<5 mg) or higher (>5 mg) doses. CONCLUSIONS Although recent evidence supports a 10-mg initiation nomogram, clinicians should consider patient-specific factors prior to deciding an initial warfarin dose. If a 10-mg loading dose is utilized, strict compliance with the protocol is necessary.
Venous Thrombosis, Clinical Trials as Topic, Time Factors, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Anticoagulants, Hemorrhage, Drug Administration Schedule, Thromboembolism, Acute Disease, Humans, Warfarin, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Venous Thrombosis, Clinical Trials as Topic, Time Factors, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Anticoagulants, Hemorrhage, Drug Administration Schedule, Thromboembolism, Acute Disease, Humans, Warfarin, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 16 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
