
doi: 10.1345/aph.1d464
pmid: 15187216
BACKGROUND: Traditional paper professional package inserts (PPIs) are used on a daily basis by a variety of healthcare providers to locate and disseminate drug information. Unfortunately, paper PPIs are sometimes not accessible to the healthcare provider, appear unreadable due to varied font sizes, and are often considered not to be user-friendly. In December 2000, the Food and Drug Administration proposed regulations that would revise the format of PPIs. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether electronic delivery of PPI information is achievable in community pharmacy practice settings. METHODS: Electronic PPIs are an alternative means of delivering this information. This 12-week proof-of-concept study evaluated the Health Information Designs/Thomson Healthcare and Etreby Computer Company for electronic delivery of PPIs in 6 chain and 4 independent community pharmacies, with 5 pharmacies evaluating each system. Participating pharmacists were asked 9 questions designed to determine the feasibility of implementing electronic PPI delivery, as well as pharmacist satisfaction with each system. RESULTS: Pharmacists deemed both systems to be accessible and user-friendly. Pharmacists from both groups felt that the electronic PPIs were challenging to read and that printing took too long. CONCLUSIONS: Future studies in a more diverse selection of dispensing sites, including pharmacies (community and hospital based), clinics, and physician practices, need to be performed to maximize the use of electronic PPIs.
Pharmacies, Computer Communication Networks, Drug Information Services, Feasibility Studies, Product Labeling, Pharmacists
Pharmacies, Computer Communication Networks, Drug Information Services, Feasibility Studies, Product Labeling, Pharmacists
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
