
This chapter argues for a more socially just situation for disadvantaged students. It is observed that properly defining the terms of educational inclusion is an important start in this endeavour. The chapter discusses the justice arguments espoused by the noted philosophers Jeremy Bentham and John Rawls. It is observed that while there is merit in both of these approaches, they may still represent a denial of justice. The chapter discusses why purely distributive approaches may be insufficient to achieve social justice. It is argued that the work of Iris Marion Young and her five faces of oppression – exploitation; marginalisation; powerlessness; cultural imperialism; and violence – is an important framework which can be used to bring about a more socially just position for disadvantaged students.
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
