
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>doi: 10.13125/ch/4757
Two ways of understanding bioethics exist. One, with a hermeneutic methodology, is interested in the living subjectivity of the sick person as prioritized by the dialogue between doctor and patient, and the other, which is based on facts and information at the time of making decisions.
Critical Hermeneutics, N. Special I (2021): PHILOSOPHY TODAY: The Need of Humanities to Build the World of Future
Ethics, BD10-701, BJ1-1725, Speculative philosophy
Ethics, BD10-701, BJ1-1725, Speculative philosophy
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
