
doi: 10.1306/m60585c7
Abstract The main factors in evaluating carbonate reservoirs are lithofacies, pore types, shelf setting, sequence stratigraphy, and diagenetic overprint. Several patterns are evident based on a review of carbonate reservoirs from around the world. First, dolomites, grainstones, and boundstones are the most common carbonate reservoir rock types, but any carbonate lithofacies can be modified by diagenesis to form porous rock. Second, secondary pore types tend to dominate carbonate reservoir facies, as opposed to primary pore types. Third, inner shelf, outer shelf, and slope lithofacies belts are prime exploration fairways that are relatively predictable, with middle shelf prospects being less so. Fourth, sequence stratigraphy describes the shelf-building and basin-filling pattern of carbonate sediments and provides useful models for exploration and production. Finally, carbonate sediments are subjected to two main types of diagenetic overprinting: steady subsidence into deep burial realms of diagenesis or subsidence interrupted by one or more periods of uplift and associated porosity producing diagenetic reactions.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
