Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
https://doi.org/10.1...arrow_drop_down
https://doi.org/10.1306/ce3352...
Part of book or chapter of book . 1991 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
addClaim

Paleokarst Targets

Authors: Richard D. Fritz;

Paleokarst Targets

Abstract

Abstract The process of diagenesis can be defined for HD-reservoirs as porosity constructive or porosity destructive. Most reservoirs have been “metamorphosed” to some extent, especially carbonates, and this process develops reservoir heterogeneity. Constructive diagenesis primarily involves dissolution of grains, matrix and/or cements in sandstones and carbonates. Replacement of limestone by dolomite is usually a constructive process. Porosity destruction is primarily the result of cementation, usually in the form of quartz overgrowths in sandstones or calcite and dolomite cements in carbonates. Neither of these processes are considered uniform and often add to reservoir heterogeneity caused during deposition. Karstrfication is pan of the larger process of pore fluid diagenesis as shown on the chart. Karst can be defined as a diagenetic process in a carbonate which involves turbulent flow through 5mm or greater vugs by hydronorma) or hydrothermal waters. Karst processes are both constructive and destructive. The anatomy of karst can be described based on the relative position of the water table. The opposing figure shows the standard profile of karst and it is divided into the above the water table vadose zone and the below the water table phreatic zone. The water table is seldom static so the oscillation zone is described for that area, which is between vadose and phreatic. A study of stratigraphic discontinuities is a requirement to understanding karst processes. A so called “strong” unconformity does not necessarily indicate the setting for good karst development. It takes a general understanding of tectonic history, eustatic sea-level changes and lime gap

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!