
doi: 10.13043/dys.95.2
handle: 11336/248840
While the goal of sustainable development is common to all economies, environmental performance differs between regions. The reasons for this divergence are varied. In particular, this work analyzed the possible existence of a causal relationship between the quality of institutions and environmental sustainability. By conducting a literature review, it was possible to identified authors who proposed a positive relationship. On the other hand, a more current approach posits weak institutional frameworks as the cause of environmental degradation, related to the idea of "natural resource curse". This analysis is based on data from the Environmental Performance Index (EPI) and an institutional quality indicator, developed by us, for a sample of 180 countries. The results show an outstanding correlation between the variables. In addition, Granger causality was tested for the panel using the method of Dumitrescu and Hurlin (2012). These findings allow affirming a long-term statistical relationship, based on the existence of changes in institutional quality associated with variations in environmental performance.
INSTITUCIONES POLITICAS, medio ambiente, DESARROLLO SOSTENIBLE, Economics as a science, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.2, desarrollo económico y social, DESARROLLO ECONOMICO ysocial, Economic history and conditions, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5, HC10-1085, HB71-74, desarrollo sostenible, instituciones políticas
INSTITUCIONES POLITICAS, medio ambiente, DESARROLLO SOSTENIBLE, Economics as a science, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.2, desarrollo económico y social, DESARROLLO ECONOMICO ysocial, Economic history and conditions, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5, HC10-1085, HB71-74, desarrollo sostenible, instituciones políticas
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
