Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Stability of Asphaltic Concrete Mixtures

Authors: Allen, David L.; Roghani, Hossien;

Stability of Asphaltic Concrete Mixtures

Abstract

This study was initiated with the general objective of quantifying some of the parameters that govern the stability and rutting characteristics of asphalt-bound materials. Aggregate type and gradation, loading magnitudes and patterns asphalt types and viscosity, are known to affect the stability of an asphalt mixture. The study was conducted in three phases. The first phase was a study of the effects of large stone gradations on the rutting and fatigue characteristics of an asphalt base mixture. The second phase was an in-depth study of the mastic portion (smaller than 3/8-inch) of an asphalt mixture. The third phase was a laboratory analysts of field cores obtained from in-service pavements, and rutting measurements on a number of in-service pavements. It can be concluded tnat large stone base mixtures are less susceptible to rutting than base mixture with finer gradations. Also, large stone base mixture having a polymer modified asphalt cement appeared to have less rutting potential (based on laboratory rutting tests) than an equivalent mixture without a modified asphalt cement. Mastic mixtures that contain manufactured limestone sands have less rutting potential than mixtures that contain natural sands. It is recommended that the percentage of natural sands be limited in the mastic portion of a mixture. From this study, there appears to be no correlation between Marshall stability and resilient modulus when testing field cores. It is concluded that the Marshall test is not a good indicator of rutting behavior or resilient strength.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Transportation Engineering

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!