Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

READING COMPREHENSION CONSTRAINS WORD READING

A TONGUE TWISTER STUDY BY MODERATING ATTENTIONAL CONTROL
Authors: Wang, Xueying;

READING COMPREHENSION CONSTRAINS WORD READING

Abstract

Numerous research studies show word reading performance influences reading comprehension. Few studies investigate how reading comprehension influences word reading. The current study explores whether alleviating the attention required for reading comprehension correlates with a better word reading performance. Three types of tongue twister reading tasks that involve recall (RR), semantic priming (PP), and instructional focus on the phonological information (PF) all have a high demand for attention on word reading. Differently, the attention demanded by PP tasks on reading comprehension is smaller than RR and RF tasks. Numbers of speech errors are used to manifest the variability of these three attentional control modes. It is predicted that during tongue twister readings, task types demanding less attention on reading comprehension will elicit fewer speech errors. Mixed and fixed effect Poisson regression analysis with RR tasks as the comparison foundation shows a highly significant correlation (p< .001) between total speech error numbers and PP tasks; no significant correlations between total speech error numbers and PF tasks. These results offer evidence that reducing the attention demanded on reading comprehension alleviates the attentional control strain and allows better performance on word reading. This study suggests understanding the interaction between reading comprehension and word reading through speech errors by including executive functions like attentional control is a hopeful direction. Improvements and future directions are discussed in the end.

�� 2022 Xueying Wang

Related Organizations
Keywords

FOS: Languages and literature

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!