<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Objectives: To present the pros and cons of passive physical therapy modalities, on the basis of the existing body of evidence, for the management of neck disorders namely whiplash-associated disorders and all other nonspecific neck disorders and complaints. Findings: The existing body of evidence on effectiveness is extremely disappointing. Only a handful of studies have met minimal methodological standards in the field of physiotherapy, including medical and surgery. Of all passive physical therapy modalities only mobilization/manipulation have shown some evidence of effectiveness. Conclusions: The long list of passive physical therapy modalities must be drastically shortened. The impression that manual therapy and physiotherapy may be more efficacious than medicine in the management of neck disorders may be explained by the patient's desire for a more "holistic approach" which includes personal and physical contact. The cons of passive modalities are that they may lead to patient's passivity, inactivit...
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |