Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Characterization, Compositional Analysis and Calorific Value of Terminalia ivorensis Sawdust, Corncob and Low-Density Polyethylene as Potential Blended Feedstock for Bio-oil Production

Authors: Sakina Bello; Taofik Olatunde Uthman; Serdar Surgun; Abdullahi Muhammad Sokoto;

Characterization, Compositional Analysis and Calorific Value of Terminalia ivorensis Sawdust, Corncob and Low-Density Polyethylene as Potential Blended Feedstock for Bio-oil Production

Abstract

Biomass presents a promising alternative to fossil fuels, and its potential can be further enhanced through co-pyrolysis with plastics or polymers. This study investigates the feasibility of co-pyrolyzing corncob, sawdust, and low-density polyethylene (LDPE) for bio-oil production. Characterization of the feedstocks using ASTM standard revealed significant hemicellulose content in corncob (28.58%) and sawdust (25.32%), indicating their potential for yielding lighter bio-oil components. Proximate analysis using ASTM standard indicated volatile matter contents of 76.11±0.23% for corncob and 71.24±0.54% for sawdust, while LDPE exhibited a higher calorific value of 41.23 MJ/kg compared to 8.10 MJ/kg for corncob and 26.20 MJ/kg for sawdust. FTIR analysis identified notable C=O carbonyls, C=C alkenes and aromatic content in corncob and sawdust, suggesting their suitability for bio-oil production. Thermogravimetric analysis revealed significant weight loss for corncob and sawdust between 200°C and 400°C, corresponding to hemicellulose and cellulose decomposition, whereas LDPE degradati on commenced at 400°C. Differential thermal analysis curves confirmed endothermic peaks for both biomass resources and LDPE, indicating thermal stability. These findings underscore the potential of co-pyrolysis in enhancing bio-oil yield and quality, thereby contributing to waste reducti on and sustainable energy solutions.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!