Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

A Study of Strategies to Achieve Proper N95 Respirator Use by Regular N95 Respirator

Authors: Nuttakarn Tontiruck; Phanumas Krisorn; Naesinee Chaiear; Thanaphoom Aupongkaroon;

A Study of Strategies to Achieve Proper N95 Respirator Use by Regular N95 Respirator

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To explore different strategies for achieving proper use of N95 respirators by hospital staff, including viewing the donning process in a mirror, receiving assistance from a Buddy during donning, and using a bouffant cap to cover the hair after donning an N95 respirator. This study evaluated the fit factor, the time required for donning a respirator, and the practical usability of each strategy. METHODS This quasi-experimental study involved 60 healthcare workers. Demographic and medical information were collected using Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) compliant questionnaires. Facial dimensions were measured and classified into three face-size groups according to the NIOSH bivariate panel. Participants practiced one of four different N95 respirator donning strategies after watching a training video: using a mirror, receiving Buddy assistance, and using a bouffant cap. A quantitative fit test (QNFT) was conducted before and after practicing each strategy following a modified OSHA protocol. After completing each of the strategies, participants indicated their preferred donning method. They were subsequently randomly divided into three groups to further practice one of the strategies, with repeated QNFTs to ensure consistency. RESULTS Post video training, participants had a higher fit factor (FFs) (median, IQR) (113.50 [48.50, 200]) and an increased passing rate (61.67%) on the fit test compared to no training which had an FF of 65.50 [18.50, 118.50]) and a passing rate of 25.00%. Practice with the Buddy and Mirror strategies resulted in significantly higher FFs for small, medium, and large face sizes. The Bouffant cap strategy showed significantly higher FF than post video training alone for small face sizes: (102 [50.5, 143]) and (50 [18, 108]), respectively. CONCLUSIONS The study found significant differences in FF for different facial sizes, with participants having medium and large face sizes achieving higher FFs compared to those with small face sizes. For individuals with small face sizes, FF improved significantly post video training using alternative strategies (Mirror, Buddy, and Bouffant cap) compared to no training. Using a mirror during donning allowed wearers to inspect the mask fit more effectively, while the Buddy strategy proved more efficient in identifying and addressing leaks compared to self-checking. KEYWORDS N95 respirator, Quantitative Fit Tests, face sizes, health care workers, strategies

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!