
Aim: The purpose of this study was to examine the intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of physiotherapists using the Pirani scoring system for clubfoot to score digital photographs of infants’ feet. Methods: Twelve infant feet were photographed to reflect variations in the six clinical signs of clubfoot. Physiotherapists viewed the photographs and scored the feet using the Pirani scoring system on two separate occasions. Results: Intra-rater reliability was excellent when scoring photographs, while inter-rater reliability was found to be fair to good for most subscales. Experienced therapists demonstrated higher reliability than novice therapists but not significantly so. Reliability was equivalent between the Pirani scoring system and a modified five-point scoring system created for this study. Scoring the rigidity of equinus subscale was found to be more reliable than the other subscales (P<0.01), which did not differ significantly from each other.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
