Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Penile cellulitis

Authors: T, Aldeen; J, Mantell;

Penile cellulitis

Abstract

A37-year-old married man presented to his GP with a 4-day history of itching and painless swelling of his penis. He was treated with a compound antifungal, anti-inflammatory disinfectant cream (Timodine cream, Reckitt & Colman, Hull) without response. Three days later, the patient attended the accident and emergency department at his local hospital with the same complaint. He was diagnosed as having an ‘infected penis’, and was advised instead to attend the genitourinary medicine (GUM) clinic. At the GUM clinic, the patient denied any history of allergy or genital trauma before his complaint. He was in a monogamous sexual relationship with his wife, and only practised peno-insertive vaginal intercourse. He had sexual intercourse 2 weeks previously. There was no significant past medical history. On examination, he was overweight and apyrexial. There was a painless diffusely swollen penis with a ring of crusts at the tip of the foreskin and purulent discharge around the glans penis. There was no urethral discharge and no inguinal lymphadenopathy (Figure 1). There was tenderness on attempting to retract the foreskin. Routine urinalysis for pyuria and proteinuria were negative. Screening for urethral gonococcal and chlamydial infections were negative. However, culture of the purulent discharge taken from the subpreputial sac grew beta-haemolytic group A Streptococcus pyogenes. The patient was initially treated with a 2-week course of amoxycillin and flucloxacillin, and his condition improved dramatically after 4 days.

Keywords

Adult, Diagnosis, Differential, Male, Penile Diseases, Streptococcal Infections, Humans, Cellulitis

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    5
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
5
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!