
pmid: 27409786
Objective:To explore and determine relationship between psychosocial factors and work-related fatigue among emergency and critical care nurses in Brunei.Methods:Cross-sectional study conducted on all emergency and critical care nurses across Brunei public hospitals from February to April 2016.Results:201 nurses participated in the study (82% response rate). A total of 36% of the variance of chronic fatigue was explained by stress, trust in management, decision latitude, self-rated health, and work–family conflict. Burnout, self-rated health, commitment to workplace, and trust in management explained 30% of the variance of acute fatigue. Stress, work–family conflict and reward explained 28% of the variance of intershift recovery after controlling for significant sociodemographic variables. Smoking was identified as an important sociodemographic factor for work-related fatigue.Conclusions:Psychosocial factors were good predictors of work-related fatigue. A range of psychosocial factors were established, however more research is required to determine all possible causation factors of nurses' work-related fatigue.
Adult, Male, Brunei, Hospitals, Public, Health Status, Work-Life Balance, Nurses, Emergency Nursing, Nursing Staff, Hospital, Critical Care Nursing, Mental Fatigue, Job Satisfaction, Cross-Sectional Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Work Schedule Tolerance, Humans, Female, Burnout, Professional, Fatigue, Stress, Psychological
Adult, Male, Brunei, Hospitals, Public, Health Status, Work-Life Balance, Nurses, Emergency Nursing, Nursing Staff, Hospital, Critical Care Nursing, Mental Fatigue, Job Satisfaction, Cross-Sectional Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Work Schedule Tolerance, Humans, Female, Burnout, Professional, Fatigue, Stress, Psychological
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 35 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
