Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

CINV in the UK: a prospective audit of patient experience

Authors: Cheryl, Vidall;

CINV in the UK: a prospective audit of patient experience

Abstract

Chemotherapy induces nausea and vomiting in a significant number of cancer patients across the world each day. Unfortunately patients tend to be at home and away from the specialist oncology centres when the symptoms are at their worst. This leads to a disconnect between what health professionals predict will happen to patients and what patients actually experience, especially in the delayed phase of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) ( Grunberg, 2004 ). Following feedback from a European forum (see preceding article, p. 22-8) that CINV is still poorly managed, the UK Oncology Nursing Society (UKONS) is proposing a nation-wide, multi-site audit of the patient-reported CINV experience by reviewing specially-designed CINV diaries. Each cycle of treatment will be recorded and side effects closely monitored for several days after treatment. Furthermore, the audit will assess the clinical prescribing habits, use of international CINV guidelines and variations in local protocols for these patients. An online survey will be undertaken by the clinical teams on what they predict a group of chemotherapy patients will experience by way of CINV. This audit will then be compared to the reported side effects experienced by the patients. It is proposed that this audit will provide evidence of how NHS and private oncology teams manage CINV within the UK.

Keywords

Vomiting, Humans, Antineoplastic Agents, Nausea, Prospective Studies, United Kingdom

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!