Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae: controlling the spread of infection

Authors: Linda Bissett;

ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae: controlling the spread of infection

Abstract

Extended spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae were first reported in Europe in the 1980s and have since become a worldwide problem. This has resulted in increased morbidity, mortality and cost in treating the infections they cause (Paterson et al, 2001; Bisson et al, 2002). In the UK the prevalence of ESBL rose from 5.4% in 1997 to 22.7% in 1999 (Goossens, 2000). ESBL are not the only ß-lactamases to present resistance to 1st, 2nd and 3rd generation cephalosporins but are the most important. New strains produce a particular type of ESBL, the CTX-M type, which is able to break down a wider range of antibiotics. These strains were unrecorded in the UK prior to 2000. They have spread rapidly since 2003, causing infections such as urinary tract infections (UTIs) in hospital patients as well as those treated in the community (Livermore and Woodford, 2004). Enterobacteriaceae are a well-known cause of healthcareassociated infection (HAI). Their antimicrobial resistance is commonly caused by the production of ß-lactamases, therefore this article discusses methods used to limit the emergence of ESBL producing strains and to prevent the spread of those already present.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Cross Infection, Infection Control, Evidence-Based Medicine, Enterobacteriaceae Infections, Housekeeping, Hospital, Communicable Diseases, Emerging, Risk Assessment, United Kingdom, beta-Lactam Resistance, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Risk Factors, Population Surveillance, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Prevalence, Humans

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    5
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
5
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author? Do you have the OA version of this publication?