
pmid: 16607256
Graduated compression stockings are used prophylactically on a variety of patients within acute hospitals. Anecdotal evidence suggests patients have a limited understanding of this treatment. The aim of this qualitative study was to explore patients' experiences of compression stockings and to ascertain perceptions of their use. Information was gathered using telephone interviews from a sample of 12adults who had been patients within the past 2months, and who had worn compression stockings for more than 48hours. The results showed that patients received little or no information from healthcare staff regarding compression stockings, but that they did have knowledge from other sources, such as long-haul flight advice. This raises issues of informed consent and patient empowerment and highlights the need for both verbal and written information. The information gained informed a patient information leaflet, which was developed in partnership with a patient focus group.
Adult, Informed Consent, Anthropometry, Attitude of Health Personnel, Teaching Materials, Communication, Nursing Methodology Research, Focus Groups, Nursing Staff, Hospital, Skin Care, Bandages, Perioperative Care, Patient Education as Topic, Surveys and Questionnaires, Humans, Pamphlets, Power, Psychological, Attitude to Health, Needs Assessment, Qualitative Research
Adult, Informed Consent, Anthropometry, Attitude of Health Personnel, Teaching Materials, Communication, Nursing Methodology Research, Focus Groups, Nursing Staff, Hospital, Skin Care, Bandages, Perioperative Care, Patient Education as Topic, Surveys and Questionnaires, Humans, Pamphlets, Power, Psychological, Attitude to Health, Needs Assessment, Qualitative Research
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 12 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
