
pmid: 15218439
Patients with malodorous wounds often experience social isolation, depression, shame, embarrassment and poor appetite, all of which can have a negative impact on their quality of life. The healthcare professionals caring for them face difficult clinical challenges in terms of treating the cause and managing the symptoms. This study employed a randomized, placebo-controlled double-blind design to investigate the effectiveness of metronidazole gel on wound malodour, the main focus of this article. In addition, changes in self-report of mood state were also explored. There was a 100% success rate for the metronidazole gel, mostly within 3 days, with no adverse events reported. As there was a 76% success rate in the placebo group, there was no significant difference in success rates between the two groups. Odour ratings given by patients and nurses were significantly correlated (P<0.001). There was no significant difference in mood state between the groups over time. This study provides some evidence to support the use of metronidazole gel in the treatment of patients with malodorous wounds, but indicates the need for further research in this area.
Male, Time Factors, Attitude of Health Personnel, Pain, Nursing Staff, Hospital, Administration, Cutaneous, Skin Care, Severity of Illness Index, Necrosis, Treatment Outcome, Anti-Infective Agents, Double-Blind Method, Metronidazole, Odorants, Quality of Life, Humans, Female, Attitude to Health, Gels, Nursing Assessment
Male, Time Factors, Attitude of Health Personnel, Pain, Nursing Staff, Hospital, Administration, Cutaneous, Skin Care, Severity of Illness Index, Necrosis, Treatment Outcome, Anti-Infective Agents, Double-Blind Method, Metronidazole, Odorants, Quality of Life, Humans, Female, Attitude to Health, Gels, Nursing Assessment
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 39 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
