Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Patients’ and nurses’ perceptions of quality nursing activities

Authors: Harriet Conley, Wichowski; Sylvia M, Kubsch; Jennifer, Ladwig; Carmen, Torres;

Patients’ and nurses’ perceptions of quality nursing activities

Abstract

Nurses and patients come from varying backgrounds, and have different life experiences. Their perceptions regarding what comprises quality nursing care may differ. The objective of this article was to determine whether there is a difference in the perceived importance of nursing activities from the point of view of patients and nurses. If differing perceptions were found, the goal would then be to increase nursing awareness of these differences. A convenience sample of 30 nurses and 30 patients on a medical-–surgical unit were surveyed about nursing care using a 41-item questionnaire. Data obtained were divided into four classes of nursing activities: psychosocial, physical, safety, and indirect. There was a significant difference in the perceived importance of nursing activities by nurses and patients in the psychosocial and safety categories. Nursing activities that may not be recognized as such by patients, or which are not seen as important to quality care, should be clarified for patients. Clarification may also be useful in helping patients to understand the professional nursing role. In addition, this insight may heighten patient satisfaction with caregiving.

Keywords

Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Analysis of Variance, Inpatients, Safety Management, Attitude of Health Personnel, Middle Aged, Nursing Staff, Hospital, Nurse's Role, Nursing Evaluation Research, Perioperative Nursing, Surveys and Questionnaires, Educational Status, Humans, Female, Attitude to Health, Aged, Quality of Health Care

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    14
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
14
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!