Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Patients' quality of life and clean intermittent self-catheterization

Authors: Woodward, S; Rew, M;

Patients' quality of life and clean intermittent self-catheterization

Abstract

This article examines the available literature surrounding the procedure of clean intermittent self-catheterization (CISC) and its impact on patients' quality of life. Many articles have been written about, and much research has been carried out into, the practicalities of performing CISC regarding dexterity, disability, etc. and its advantages and disadvantages related to infection rates and complications. However, there appear to be very few articles addressing the day-to-day problems that having to perform CISC presents to patients. While many articles do acknowledge that CISC improves patients' quality of life, very few go on to identify and discuss the daily life activities that are impacted upon by having to perform the procedure. There is a need for further research from patients' perspectives to identify the issues that they have in living with this inconvenience and in order for carers to understand fully the implications of CISC on a patient's quality of life. With this insight, carers will be better armed to help patients overcome their fears and more supportive in the ongoing care of the patient. Non-compliance is the main reason for patients' inability to perform CISC and with a better understanding of the problems, carers will be able to give practical help and support.

Country
United Kingdom
Keywords

610, Hemorrhage, Urination Disorders, 620, Catheterization, Clinical Nursing Research, Self Care, Patient Satisfaction, Urinary Tract Infections, Quality of Life, Humans, Patient Compliance, Nursing Assessment

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    65
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
65
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!