
pmid: 11261028
This study examined the practice of preoperative fluid restrictions and the influence of the hospital ‘nil by mouth’ policy on clinical practice. Structured interviews were used to assess the knowledge of nurses and anaesthetists relating to current hospital policy, their attitudes to fluid fasting and the constituents of clear fluids. The interval between the last intake of fluid and the induction of anaesthesia was measured in 90 adult patients to determine actual periods of fasting. It was found that most patients on the same operating list commenced fasting simultaneously with little or no attempt made to individualize the timing which contributed to prolonged periods without fluids, ranging from 3 hours 30 minutes to 17 hours and 45 minutes. Only 30% of nurses were aware of the hospital policy compared with 75% of anaesthetists. The evidence from this study demonstrated that the hospital policy was not reflected in clinical practice which continued to be based on tradition.
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Time Factors, Attitude of Health Personnel, Fasting, Nursing Staff, Hospital, Organizational Policy, Enteral Nutrition, Hospital Administration, Anesthesiology, Perioperative Nursing, Surveys and Questionnaires, Preoperative Care, Medical Staff, Hospital, Humans, Practice Patterns, Physicians'
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Time Factors, Attitude of Health Personnel, Fasting, Nursing Staff, Hospital, Organizational Policy, Enteral Nutrition, Hospital Administration, Anesthesiology, Perioperative Nursing, Surveys and Questionnaires, Preoperative Care, Medical Staff, Hospital, Humans, Practice Patterns, Physicians'
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
