
pmid: 10624193
Hydrocolloid dressings have been widely used since the late 1970s. This article compares two hydrocolloid dressings — 3M Tegasorb dressing and ConvaTec's Granuflex (E) — and highlights their similarities and differences when used in the clinical situation. Both hydrocolloids were reported to perform favourably by users in most situations. 3M Tegasorb dressing becomes transparent in use and this function was rated highly by users compared to the opaque Granuflex (E). In addition, 3M Tegasorb showed better adherence. One limitation of the study was the small number of patients studied. Weekly assessments yielded 90 data sets in total.
Adult, Male, Wound Healing, Attitude of Health Personnel, Exudates and Transudates, Treatment Outcome, Patient Satisfaction, Humans, Wounds and Injuries, Female, Colloids, Bandages, Hydrocolloid
Adult, Male, Wound Healing, Attitude of Health Personnel, Exudates and Transudates, Treatment Outcome, Patient Satisfaction, Humans, Wounds and Injuries, Female, Colloids, Bandages, Hydrocolloid
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 13 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
