Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Implementing evidence-based practice for urinary catheterization

Authors: F, Adams; M, Cooke;

Implementing evidence-based practice for urinary catheterization

Abstract

Nursing development units (NDUs) are ideal centres for the critical examination of clinical nursing practice. In addition, staff are enabled to clarify appropriate and effective methods of care and interventions based on evidence to date (Department of Health (DoH), 1993, 1998; English National Board (ENB), 1996, 1997; Centre for Policy in Nursing Research, 1997). In July 1996, the staff within the cardiology NDU at Addenbrooke's NHS Trust looked at the potential for various projects that were central to practice. One concerned the management of urinary catheters. A pilot study was initiated, one outcome of which was the design of a project checklist based on Sackett et al's definition of evidence-based practice (EBP) (Sackett et al, 1997). In this article, the aims and intentions of the project are evaluated in relation to the problems associated with implementing evidence. In addition, the framework of the White Paper (DoH, 1998) is examined against the need for an organizational infrastructure, which is required to enable achievement of the outcomes of EBP. The benefits of the project are outlined, both in the changes to practice and for the unit. Recommendations for other professionals are also offered, as there are few recorded experiences in the literature of implementation of EBP, the process framework required and the costs involved.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Evidence-Based Medicine, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Humans, Pilot Projects, Program Development, Urinary Catheterization, Hospital Units, Clinical Nursing Research

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    7
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
7
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!