
Staffing in Maternity Units, the latest report from the King’s Fund (2011), puts in writing what many managers of maternity services have long suspected, that the increasing demand for more midwives and consultant obstetricians is unattainable and unaffordable. The maternity services budget must contribute to the savings expected from the NHS, leaving maternity at a crossroads between crisis and opportunity, depending which way you look at it. It is estimated that in the next 15 years, 50% of midwives will be eligible to retire (King’s Fund, 2011). Fifteen years is not a long time in terms of strategic forward planning for a maternity service that is likely to need to deliver increasingly complex care unless some drastic action on promoting normality is taken. Already the rising birth rate, obesity, increased medical complexity, increasing maternal age, and the rising caesarean section rate are making staffing maternity services difficult and costly. Yet despite calls for increased staffing due to safety concerns, the latest report from the Centre for Maternal and Chile Enquiries (CMACE) (2011) indicates that
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
