Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Help-seeking behaviour for the treatment of chronic pain

Authors: Nicola, Cornally; Geraldine, McCarthy;

Help-seeking behaviour for the treatment of chronic pain

Abstract

There are more people living with chronic pain than cardiovascular disease and cancer combined. Many people with chronic pain do not seek help from health professionals and suffer in silence for many years. Untreated chronic pain can lead to increased disability, increased risk of fall, depression, sleep deprivation, reduced quality of life and social isolation. The aim of this review is to determine the factors associated with help-seeking for chronic pain in an effort to highlight potential reasons why help may or may not be sought. A total of 23 studies were included in the review. On the whole the review has demonstrated that the most significant demographic and clinical factors associated with help-seeking were increasing age, female gender, pain severity and disability. Psychosocial factors included past help seeking, outcome expectancy, age-related beliefs, social cost and social influence. While the evidence presented appears promising, some conflicting results were found and methodological limitations were noted. Further research needs to examine the underlying determinants of help-seeking behaviour for chronic pain underpinned by theory. The information derived from such research will augment the development of a complex nursing intervention to improve help-seeking for chronic pain.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Male, Age Factors, Pain, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Severity of Illness Index, Nursing Research, Cross-Sectional Studies, Research Design, Chronic Disease, Humans, Pain Management, Female, Longitudinal Studies, Sex Distribution, Qualitative Research, Pain Measurement

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    66
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
66
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!