Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Revista Quaestio Iur...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Revista Quaestio Iuris
Article . 2016 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Revista Quaestio Iuris
Article
License: CC BY NC ND
Data sources: UnpayWall
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

CHAVE OU FECHO? o debate jurídico erudito sobre a responsabilidade do Poder Moderador

Authors: Walter Guandalini Junior;

CHAVE OU FECHO? o debate jurídico erudito sobre a responsabilidade do Poder Moderador

Abstract

Trabalho enviado em 18 de janeiro de 2016. Aceito em 18 de janeiro de 2016. DOI: 10.12957/rqi.2016.20809 Resumo Este estudo aborda os debates juridicos ocorridos na segunda metade do seculo XIX acerca da responsabilidade pelo exercicio do poder moderador. A partir de uma analise arqueologica da estrutura e do conteudo dos argumentos empregados, pretende-se compreender as regras que compoem a ordem discursiva no interior da qual o debate se desenvolve, e que presidiram o intricado processo de modernizacao do discurso juridico brasileiro apos a independencia. Ao final pode-se concluir que as divergencias entre os juristas do periodo nao sao apenas politicas ou hermeneuticas, mas refletem o contraste entre duas concepcoes distintas de ordem juridica: uma racional-realista, que enxerga o direito como conjunto de relacoes necessarias extraidas do espirito da ordem constitucional; e outra legal-formalista, que concebe o direito como conjunto de normas positivas formalizadas no texto da constituicao Palavras-chave : historia do direito constitucional; Constituicao de 1824; poder moderador; ordem do discurso juridico; modernizacao da ordem juridica brasileira. Abstract This study addresses the legal debates that took place in the second half of the nineteenth century about the legal responsibility of the moderating power. By doing an archaeological analysis of the structure and content of the arguments used, it aims to understand the rules that make up the discursive order within which the debate develops, and which have inspired the complex process of brazilian legal discourse modernization after the country’s independence. It concludes that differences among jurists of the period are not only political or hermeneutical, but also reflect the contrast between two different conceptions of law: a rational-realist one, which sees law as a set of necessary relationships drawn from the spirit of constitutional order; and a legal-formalist one, which sees law as a set of positive norms textually formalized on the constitution. Keywords: history of constitutional law; Constitution of 1824; Moderating Power; order of legal discourse; modernization of brazilian legal order.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2
Average
Top 10%
Average
gold