
pmid: 17595554
The quality gap in the management of chronic disease is an issue which must be addressed if we are to achieve sustainability of our health system and optimal health outcomes for Canadians. The delivery of quality care needs to be a fundamental expectation of providers, professional regulators, institutional leaders and senior government leaders. Success in the arena of quality improvement comes from clarity of accountability, "obsessive" tracking and action on key performance indicators, and results-based teamwork. Strong leadership, identification of shared priorities across the country, full transparency, and an engaged public are all key to moving ahead in this critical area of Canadian healthcare.
Canada, Health Care Rationing, National Health Programs, Primary Health Care, Disease Management, Chronic Disease, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Humans, Quality Indicators, Health Care, Quality of Health Care
Canada, Health Care Rationing, National Health Programs, Primary Health Care, Disease Management, Chronic Disease, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Humans, Quality Indicators, Health Care, Quality of Health Care
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 36 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
