
pmid: 29746026
The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of the quantitative fluorescent-polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) combined system to detect chromosome alterations in miscarriage products, as an alternative to conventional cytogenetic testing.This study was conducted between 2011 and 2015 on 264 samples, analyzed using the combined system: QF-PCR/MLPA. This approach first analyzed miscarriage products for chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X and Y, using QF-PCR analysis; in case of ovular fragments, an analysis of maternal DNA was carried out in order to establish the origin of material. Whenever fetal origin was determined, MLPA analysis on the subtelomeric regions was car- ried out.On 264 miscarriages analyzed, 229 were of fetal origin and produced the following results: 53.7% normal and 46.3% pathological. Of the latter, 74.4% were autosomal aneuploidies, 10.4% triploidies, 8.5% sex chromosomal aneuploidies, 3.7% structural alterations, and 2.7% multiple aneuploidies. Results from QF-PCR were obtained from all samples, whereas unambiguous MLPA re- sults were obtained in about 90% of all cases.This approach results being highly effective for examining all chromosome aneuploidies, triploidies, as well as structural unbalanced alterations in the subtelomeric regions.
Chromosome Aberrations, Reproducibility of Results, Chromosome Disorders, Aneuploidy, Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction, Abortion, Spontaneous, Pregnancy, Humans, Female, Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction
Chromosome Aberrations, Reproducibility of Results, Chromosome Disorders, Aneuploidy, Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction, Abortion, Spontaneous, Pregnancy, Humans, Female, Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
