
In 1983, Horowitz proposed the use of an adjusted likelihood ratio index to select between alternative models. We define an alternative index based on the Akaike Information Criterion. The two indices incorporate different degrees-of-freedom corrections to the same measure of goodness-of-fit. The Akaike index favors more parsimonious models. We argue that the Akaike measure is the appropriate criterion for model selection. We utilize Horowitz's results on non-nested hypothesis testing for the new index.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 110 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
