
doi: 10.1287/opre.17.1.70
Choosing a suitable set of signals for measurement in classification procedures is poorly understood. Since classification is generally associated with a decision process, this paper shows how the entire question is most sensibly formulated as a two-stage statistical decision process. The first decision involves the detection of some suitable inferential signal, while the second is the selection of a suitable course of action or a control policy. The paper discusses techniques for choosing a set of signals for measurement, subject to certain constraints that are imposed upon this selection process, and demonstrates that the classification procedure must be considered in conjunction with the associated decision or control process, if the most appropriate inferential signals are to be selected. In this formulation, pure classification occurs if the possible actions are chosen in a particular manner. The selection of the best signal or signals for measurement may be influenced significantly by the time-dependent nature of the statistical risk.
information, communication
information, communication
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
