
doi: 10.1287/mnsc.26.1.1
The increased focus on heuristics for the approximate solution of integer programs has led to more sophisticated analysis methods for studying their performance. This paper is concerned with the worst-case approach to the analysis of heuristic performance. A worst-case study establishes the maximum deviation from optimality that can occur when a specified heuristic is applied within a given problem class. This is an important piece of information that can be combined with empirical testing and other analyses to provide a more complete evaluation of a heuristic. In this paper the basic ground rules of worst-case analysis of heuristics are reviewed, and a large variety of the existing types of worst-case results are described in terms of the knapsack problem. A selected sample of results for four other problems is given. The paper concludes with a discussion of possibilities for further research.
Research exposition (monographs, survey articles) pertaining to operations research and mathematical programming, Numerical mathematical programming methods, worst-case analysis, heuristic algorithms, integer algorithms, heuristic, computational complexity [programming], Integer programming, knapsack problem, approximate solution of integer programs
Research exposition (monographs, survey articles) pertaining to operations research and mathematical programming, Numerical mathematical programming methods, worst-case analysis, heuristic algorithms, integer algorithms, heuristic, computational complexity [programming], Integer programming, knapsack problem, approximate solution of integer programs
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 82 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
