
handle: 2108/236798
Law-breaking activities within firms are widespread but difficult to uncover, making whistleblowing by employees desirable. We investigate if and how monetary incentives and expectations of social approval or disapproval from the public, and their interactions, affect an employee’s decision to blow the whistle when the social damage from the reported misbehavior is more or less salient. Our analysis also has implications for the design and management of firms’ internal whistleblowing channels. This paper was accepted by Yan Chen, decision analysis.
Operations Research, 330, Whistleblowing, experiment, K42, Settore ECON-01/A - Economia politica, Commerce, social judgment, Settore SECS-P/01 - ECONOMIA POLITICA, experiment., Management, Information and Computing Sciences, C92, rewards, whistleblowing, D04, Tourism and Services, whistleblowing, fraud, rewards, social judgment, experiment, fraud, D04.
Operations Research, 330, Whistleblowing, experiment, K42, Settore ECON-01/A - Economia politica, Commerce, social judgment, Settore SECS-P/01 - ECONOMIA POLITICA, experiment., Management, Information and Computing Sciences, C92, rewards, whistleblowing, D04, Tourism and Services, whistleblowing, fraud, rewards, social judgment, experiment, fraud, D04.
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 57 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
