Downloads provided by UsageCounts
handle: 11380/1168938
Cutting and packing (C&P) is a fundamental research area that models a large number of managerial and industrial optimization issues. A solution to a C&P problem basically consists of a set of one-dimensional or multidimensional items packed in/cut from one or more bins, by satisfying problem constraints and minimizing a given objective function. Normal patterns are a well-known C&P technique used to build solutions where each item is aligned to the bottom of the bin along each dimension. They are used in several C&P techniques because they can reduce the search space while preserving optimality, but their limit is that their number grows consistently when number of items and size of the bin increase. In this paper we propose a new set of patterns, called meet in the middle, that preserves optimality and leads to several interesting results. Their computation is achieved with the same time complexity as that of the normal patterns, but their number is never higher, and in practical applications it frequently shows reductions of about 50%. These new patterns are applied to improve some exact state-of-the-art C&P techniques, including arc-flow formulations, combinatorial branch-and-bound algorithms, and mixed-integer linear programs. The efficacy of the improved techniques is assessed by extensive computational tests on a number of relevant applications. The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.2018.0806 .
cutting and packing; normal patterns; meet in the middle; cutting stock; orthogonal packing, cutting stock, Combinatorial optimization, cutting and packing, normal patterns, orthogonal packing, meet in the middle
cutting and packing; normal patterns; meet in the middle; cutting stock; orthogonal packing, cutting stock, Combinatorial optimization, cutting and packing, normal patterns, orthogonal packing, meet in the middle
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 63 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 128 | |
| downloads | 62 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts