Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

In Their Own Voices

Authors: Zezza, Stefania;

In Their Own Voices

Abstract

In 1946 David P. Boder, an American psychiatrist, interviewed more than one hundred displaced persons, mostly survivors of the Holocaust. The interviews, taped with a wire recorder, are among the earliest oral testimonies to be collected. Boder aimed at letting American public opinion know the impact of catastrophe which had happened in Europe, focusing also on the emergency of the refugees, and to analyze the impact of deculturation on the survivors through the analysis of their linguistic choices. Boder was not a historian nor he had a detailed knowledge on the implementation of the Final Solution, which explains several misunderstandings in the interpretation and the translation of the interviews. He aimed at recording the survivors’ accounts while the events were still fresh in their memory. In his opinion the recording and analysis of the interviewees’ linguistic choices could help in identifying the effects of trauma, or as he called it, the deculturation, on their psyche. This is the reason why, in the majority of cases, he let the interviewees talk «not only in their own language, but in their own voices». Seven of the interviewees were Salonikan Jews, who had been deported partly to Auschwitz, partly to Bergen Belsen. These interviews provide the opportunity to seriously examine the dynamic of the transmission of memory, of the impact of trauma and of its relation with language. At the same time, in particular, those with the Salonikans, allow a deeper understanding of the fate of a Community, almost completely annihilated during the implementation of the Final Solution.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!