Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Virulence Determinants of Uropathogenic Escherichia Coli versus Commensal Fecal Escherichia Coli

Authors: Safia A. Al Gamal; Laila H. Saleh; Shrief S. Soliman;

Virulence Determinants of Uropathogenic Escherichia Coli versus Commensal Fecal Escherichia Coli

Abstract

Background: Uropathogenic E. coli (UPEC) is by far the most common cause of urinary tract infections (UTIs) worldwide . The degree of pathogenicity is dependent on the presence of virulence factors; however the clinical aspects of such facto rs are not yet fully understood. Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of virulence determinants in UPEC of urinary tract infected subjects and commensal fecal E. coli isolates of healthy individuals. Methodology: A total of 208 patients with clinically diagnosed UTIs were included in the study, 170/208 yielded significant bacterial growth. One hundred fifty five E. coli isolates (100 UPEC from patients with suspected UTIs, 50 commensal fecal E. coli and 5 urinary E. coli isolates from apparently healthy individuals with significant asymptomatic bacteriuria) were investigated phenotypically for α-hly, cnf 1, in vitro biofilm formation and P fimbrae. Four urovirulence genes (hly A, cnf 1, aer and pap C ) were investigated by PCR. Results: α-Hly & cnf 1 virulence factors and their corresponding genes were significantly(P= 0.001) detected in UPEC isolates compared with fecal E. coli isolates, with insignificant difference in phenotypic expression of p fimbrae and PCR assay of aer & pap C genes. Conclusion: the studied virulence determinants are involved in both pathogenesis of UTI and in the ability of E.coli to survive either in intestine or in the new ecological niches such as the human urinary tract.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!