
handle: 10171/43316
En este trabajo se estudian tres tesis de diversos autores renacentistas sobre el intelecto agente: a) la de quienes negaron la distinción real entre uno y otro intelecto: Jacques Lefèvre d´Étaples, Francisco Suárez y Gabriel Vázquez. b) La de los que admitieron sólo una distinción formal o de razón: Felipe Melanchton, Juan Velcurio y Rodolfo Goclenio. c) La de quienes aceptaron sólo una distinción nominal: Gómez Pereira, el Brocense, Juan Eck y Agustín Faba. In this paper three theses on the agent intellect of various Renaissance writers are studied: a) those that deny the real distinction between one and another intellect: Jacques Lefèvre d’Étaples, Francisco Suárez, and Gabriel Vázquez. b) those who admitted only a formal distinction: Philip Melanchthon, John Velcurio and Rudolph Goclenius. c) those who accepted only one nominal distinction: Gómez Pereira, the Brocense, John Eck and Augustin Faba.
normalismo, formalism, agente, nominalism, agent intellect, Philosophy. Psychology. Religion, intelecto, formalismo, B, negación, denial
normalismo, formalism, agente, nominalism, agent intellect, Philosophy. Psychology. Religion, intelecto, formalismo, B, negación, denial
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
