
doi: 10.1272/jnms.69.192
pmid: 12068333
We present a case of inner head dislocation 11 years after the replacement of a bipolar prosthesis with a self-centering system. An 84-year-old woman with osteoarthritis of the left hip underwent a replacement of the Bateman UPF-II bipolar prosthesis in 1987. She fell off a chair on April 19 1998, and felt a sudden sharp pain in the left hip. Roentgenograms revealed that the inner head was dislocated from the outer head. Moreover, on June 19, when she stood up from the floor, the dislocation recurred. On July 23, a revision surgery was carried out. When the outer head was removed from the acetabulum, the bearing insert was markedly worn by the impingement of the femoral stem neck. Because there was no evidence of loosening of the femoral stem, a cemented replacement of the acetabular component was performed. At a 2-year follow-up, she had mild hip pain, but had returned fully to daily living. Our review of current published studies reveals that most inner head dislocations occurred in osteoarthritic patients. Thus, the occurrence of dislocations may be more dependent on patient selection than on failure of the bipolar prosthesis itself.
Aged, 80 and over, impingement, bipolar prosthesis, Prosthesis Design, Prosthesis Failure, self-centering system, osteoarthritis, Osteoarthritis, Humans, Female, Hip Prosthesis, Aged
Aged, 80 and over, impingement, bipolar prosthesis, Prosthesis Design, Prosthesis Failure, self-centering system, osteoarthritis, Osteoarthritis, Humans, Female, Hip Prosthesis, Aged
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 8 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
