
doi: 10.1261/rna.574407
pmid: 17652139
pmc: PMC1950755
handle: 11386/1717698 , 11573/127243 , 11367/27022
doi: 10.1261/rna.574407
pmid: 17652139
pmc: PMC1950755
handle: 11386/1717698 , 11573/127243 , 11367/27022
The G15–C48 Levitt base pair, located at a crucial position in the core of canonical tRNAs, assumes a reverse Watson–Crick (RWC) geometry. By means of bioinformatics analysis and quantum mechanics calculations we show here that such a geometry is moderately more stable than an alternative bifurcated trans geometry, involving the guanine Watson–Crick face and the cytosine keto group, which we have also found in known RNA structures. However we also demonstrate that the RWC geometry can take advantage of additional stabilizing effects such as metal binding or post-transcriptional chemical modification. One of the few strong metal binding sites characterized for cytosolic tRNAs is localized on G15, and a domain-specific complex modification known as archaeosine is widespread at position 15 in archaeal tRNAs. We have found that both the bound Mg2+ ion and the archaeosine modification induce an analogous electron density redistribution, which results in an effective stabilization of the RWC geometry. Metal binding and chemical modification thus play an interchangeable role in stabilizing the G15–C48 correct geometry. Interestingly, these different but convergent strategies are selectively adopted in the different life domains.
Models, Molecular, Binding Sites, Guanine, Guanosine, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Archaeal Proteins, RNA, Archaeal, RNA, Transfer, Enzyme Stability, Nucleic Acid Conformation, Thermodynamics, Computer Simulation, Magnesium, Pentosyltransferases, Base Pairing
Models, Molecular, Binding Sites, Guanine, Guanosine, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Archaeal Proteins, RNA, Archaeal, RNA, Transfer, Enzyme Stability, Nucleic Acid Conformation, Thermodynamics, Computer Simulation, Magnesium, Pentosyltransferases, Base Pairing
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 83 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
