Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Osteoporosis and mandibles

Authors: M, Bozic; N, Ihan Hren;

Osteoporosis and mandibles

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to find out whether mandibular bone tissues on dental panoramic tomograms (DPTs) are statistically significantly different between osteoporotic and non-osteoporotic women. We wanted to develop a simple method of common DPT analysis that could represent a simple, inexpensive and readily available screening tool for osteoporosis.DPT images of 36 women with primary osteoporosis were compared with 20 DPT images of non-osteoporotic women of the same age group. Scanned DPTs were analysed using public computer software. Mandibular atrophy was assessed by six anatomic indexes. Anatomic indexes were divided into subgroups regarding the presence of teeth. Relative bone density (RBD) was assessed using a colour histogram (CH) plugin. Nine RBD indexes were calculated as relations of CH values measured on specific sites of the mandible.The subtractions of average values of anatomic indexes with and without a tooth were 1.5 to 2.5 times higher in the osteoporotic group of women. Average of RBD indexes differed statistically significantly between the groups (P<0.05). Three RBD indexes differed statistically significantly between groups (P<0.05).Mandibular bone tissues on DPTs are statistically significantly different between osteoporotic and non-osteoporotic women. RBD of the mandible is statistically significantly lower in the osteoporotic group of women. We developed a simple method of common DPT analysis, which could represent a simple, inexpensive and readily available screening tool for osteoporosis.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Absorptiometry, Photon, Bone Density, Radiography, Panoramic, Humans, Female, Mandibular Diseases, Middle Aged, Algorithms, Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    34
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
34
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!