
doi: 10.1257/mic.20140056
handle: 10419/97246
Two players choose whether to cooperate on a project. Each of them is endowed with some evidence, and if both possess a sufficient amount, then cooperation is profitable. In order to facilitate cooperation, the players reveal evidence to one another. However, some players are concerned about privacy, and so revelation of evidence that does not result in cooperation is costly. We show that in equilibrium evidence can be exchanged both incrementally and all at once, and identify conditions under which the different rates of evidence exchange are optimal. (JEL C71, D83)
Cooperation, ddc:330, Privacy, Communication, D80, D80 [Cooperation, Privacy, Communication JEL Classification], jel: jel:C71, jel: jel:D83
Cooperation, ddc:330, Privacy, Communication, D80, D80 [Cooperation, Privacy, Communication JEL Classification], jel: jel:C71, jel: jel:D83
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 14 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
